首页> 外文OA文献 >Creating citizen-consumers? Public service reform and (un)willing selves
【2h】

Creating citizen-consumers? Public service reform and (un)willing selves

机译:创造公民消费者?公共服务改革和(非)自愿的自我

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

About the book: Postmodern theories heralded the "death of the subject", and thereby deeply contested our intuition that we are free and willing selves. In recent times, the (free) will has come under attack yet again. Findings from the neuro- and cognitive sciences claim the concept of will to be scientifically untenable, specifying that it is our brain rather than our 'self' which decides what we want to do. In spite of these challenges however, the willing self has come to take centre stage in our society: juridical and moral practices ascribing guilt, or the organization of everyday life attributing responsibilities, for instance, can hardly be understood without taking recourse to the willing subject.\udIn this vein, the authors address topics such as the genealogy of the concept of willing selves, the discourse on agency in neuroscience and sociology, the political debate on volition within neoliberal and neoconservative regimes, approaches toward novel forms of relational responsibility as well as moral evaluations in conceptualizing autonomy.
机译:关于这本书:后现代理论预示了“主题的死亡”,从而对我们的直觉-我们是自由和愿意的自我-提出了强烈的质疑。最近,(免费)将再次受到攻击。神经科学和认知科学的发现声称,意志的概念在科学上是站不住脚的,它指明了决定我们要做的是我们的大脑,而不是我们的“自我”。尽管存在这些挑战,但自愿的自我已成为我们社会的中心:例如,有罪的司法和道德实践,或日常生活中归因于责任的组织,如果不诉诸于自愿的主体,就很难理解。 。\ ud本着这种精神,作者讨论了诸如以下主题的家谱:自愿自我的概念谱系,神经科学和社会学中关于代理的论述,新自由主义和新保守主义体制内关于自愿的政治辩论,寻求关系责任的新形式的方法。作为对自治概念的道德评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号